By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

The primary targets of opposition are Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government. Criticism is aimed both at Kaja Kallas's personal conduct (her trip to Europe, which is detrimental to the health of the coalition) and at the government's political decisions regarding education, which are widely viewed as unreasonable and exacerbating existing problems. The resistance is intense and manifests as accusations concerning problems created by the government.

The confrontation is directed at the bill's initiators, who are being criticized for potentially failing to grasp the tensions that the bill's adoption would cause in relations between Estonia and Georgia. The criticism targets their political judgment and their ability to foresee the consequences.

The main opponent is the governing coalition, particularly the minister and the prime minister, who are being criticized for procedural errors and a lack of coordination. The criticism is intense, suggesting disrespect toward the Riigikogu and political calculation (the postponement of unpopular decisions due to the elections). The criticism targets both the substance of the policy and the operational organization of the government.

The speaker is fiercely opposed to the ruling coalition, leveling sharp criticism against the Reform Party, the Social Democrats, and Estonia 200. The critique targets both the substance of the policy (tax hikes) and the procedural side ("steamroller politics," the voting down of opposition proposals). A specific appeal is directed at the Social Democrats and Estonia 200, urging them to consider their constituents' opposition to the tax.

The main criticism is aimed at the Foreign Minister for his personal conduct and diplomatic impropriety in Georgia, which has been described as "wild" and "bizarre." Criticism is also directed at the lack of internal government coordination, since the Prime Minister confirmed that the incident was the minister's solo act.

The main criticism is directed at the Minister of Economic Affairs and IT, whose travel expenses are considered excessively high compared to those of other ministers. The criticism focuses on personal responsibility and the unreasonable spending of state money, demanding public explanations.