By Plenary Sessions: Vadim Belobrovtsev

Strong opposition is directed at the governing coalition, particularly Eesti 200, due to internal contradictions and the breaking of election promises. The Reform Party and the previous government (Reform Party, Isamaa, SDE) are also criticized for creating budget deficits and misleading voters. The criticism is rooted in issues of policy and credibility, accusing the rulers of believing in their own infallibility.

The confrontation is directed against the government's financial policy, criticizing the budget deficit and the inability to secure funding for critical sectors (teachers' salaries, healthcare). The criticism is policy-driven and intense, expressing deep skepticism about the prospect of finding money in the future. The core criticism is that the government lacks a plan for covering major expenditures.

The main opponents are the Reform Party and Regional Minister Madis Kallas. Criticism targets both procedural violations (the Prime Minister's irrelevant comments) and political decisions (local government funding). The intensity of the attacks is high, casting doubt on the government's honesty and fairness, and accusing them of punishing the most capable.

Strong and direct opposition to the Government of the Republic and the Prime Minister. The criticism is aimed at specific political moves (the cutting of family benefits, tax hikes) and the government’s overall stance on supporting families. The government is accused of undermining families' sense of security and frightening the public with talk of war.

Opposition is aimed at the inaction of the government (or the minister) and the unrealistic pace of the education reform, which fails to address the teacher shortage. Criticism is also directed at the Rajaleidja center's alleged refusal to take doctors' opinions into account concerning children with special educational needs (SEN). The criticism is procedural and policy-based, rather than personal.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Education (Kristina Kallas) and the government, who are accused of lacking a long-term strategy and being unable to resolve critical issues. The criticism is focused on policy and performance, centering specifically on the absence of solutions for the teacher pipeline and the shortage of support specialists. It is also highlighted that the struggle against the legacy of the Soviet Union continues 33 years later.

The primary target is the government and the prime minister, whose tax policies are sharply criticized and labeled as unfair. The criticism is policy-driven, centering on tax hikes (VAT, income tax, excise duties, car tax) and the reduction of social benefits, all of which are deepening the economic recession. The government is accused of blaming the people for the economic downturn instead of focusing on the excessive profits made by banks.