By Plenary Sessions: Reili Rand

There is no direct criticism aimed at specific opponents or political groups. The criticism focuses on the economic situation (weak competitiveness) and regional inequality, rather than individuals or specific policies.

There is too little data.

The confrontation is directed at the government and specifically the Reform Party, which is accused of violating the principles of responsible public finance policy. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, focusing on the significant increase in the debt burden to cover current expenditures.

The main confrontation is directed at the government and its ministers, criticizing both their decisions (e.g., halting the operation of cameras) and their inaction (the suspension of the climate council’s activities). The criticism is both substantive and procedural, emphasizing the negative impact of the government’s actions on security and bureaucracy. The oppositional tone is strong, suggesting the government lacks a long-term strategy.

The main opposition is aimed at the governing parties, especially the Reform Party, which is criticized for dropping the income tax increase—a move that grants a "tangible victory primarily to the wealthier segment of society." The criticism is political and focuses on the deepening of inequality and unjust priorities. Furthermore, the Centre Party is also criticized for failing to support the draft bill concerning the fee for a spot in a Tallinn kindergarten before the previous elections.

The main confrontation is with the government and the Reform Party, who are being criticized for ignoring the Hiiumaa community and dismantling the education system. The criticism is intense and focuses both on political decisions (such as the underfunding of the Health Insurance Fund) and procedural shortcomings (the Minister of Education’s absence from Hiiumaa and ramming decisions through the coordination process).

Direct confrontation is avoided, but indirectly, the lending conditions of commercial banks are being questioned, specifically regarding how the number of children is factored into assessing loan capacity. The criticism is aimed at the procedural and legal basis, not at individuals.

Insufficient data

The opposition is aimed at the government’s policies, particularly energy and labor policies, as well as potential budget cuts planned for the counties. The criticism is based on both policy and performance, accusing the government of instability and having vague objectives. A separate point of criticism is the Finance Minister’s stance that the reinforcement of the networks should be financed by private citizens.

The main criticism is aimed at the government led by the Reform Party, which is accused of withdrawing funding for regional projects and making cuts in the social sector. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, focusing on the government’s inability to solve livelihood issues and the fear that the cuts will first affect the quality of services (e.g., youth work, school meals).