By Plenary Sessions: Reili Rand

Total Sessions: 10

Fully Profiled: 10

2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Economic perspectives center on the necessity of improving the competitiveness of the Estonian economy, while simultaneously stressing the reduction of regional inequality. Specific attention has been directed towards county-level disparities in added value, export potential, and wage levels, which indicates a clear desire to harmonize regional distribution and standardize living standards across the country.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Economic viewpoints indicate support for national investments in regional transport infrastructure. The speaker is interested in the budget's impact on funding ferry links and is exploring options for utilizing EU funds in infrastructure development.
2025-09-24
15th Estonian Parliament, 6th sitting, press briefing
Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal discipline and responsible budgetary policy, taking a strong stance against borrowing to cover current expenditures. Maintaining the nation's credit rating is deemed crucial, as a downgrade would increase the cost of borrowing for both businesses and private citizens. Responsible financial policy is directly linked to increasing the country's competitiveness.
2025-09-22
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Economic perspectives focus on the positive impact of infrastructure investments on regional development, particularly in the context of islands. The need to reduce bureaucracy is also emphasized, an issue that has remained unresolved thus far due to government inaction. Regarding pricing policy, reference is made to previous price hikes, but no direct stance is offered concerning a new price increase.
2025-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary sitting.
Economic views are strongly focused on reducing inequality and promoting social justice, supporting the allocation of state resources towards families and healthcare. They oppose tax cuts that provide a "tax gift to wealthier families," and instead advocate for increasing universal benefits and lowering the VAT on foodstuffs. It is emphasized that a decrease in the number of children will inherently result in savings on the payment of family benefits.
2025-09-17
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, press briefing.
Economic perspectives emphasize the need to increase public spending in the healthcare sector, demanding hundreds of millions in additional funding for the Health Insurance Fund. The speaker is critical of the government's budget optimism, pointing out that the money found was a one-off extraordinary revenue, not a permanent surplus.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
Economic perspectives center on financial regulation and the oversight of banking activities within the mortgage sector. The speaker advocates for regulatory intervention to ensure that lending terms are consistent with social objectives, thereby preventing unfair discrimination against families.
2025-09-10
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Economic considerations directly relate to the sustainability of the healthcare institution's financing. Concern is expressed that the current funding may not be sufficient to ensure the provision of this vital service, but a broader fiscal policy position is not disclosed.
2025-09-08
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
Support is provided for raising the economy's added value and shifting towards smarter work, while opposing the introduction of low-wage labor that fails to support productivity growth. A stable investment environment and a consistently more affordable electricity price for the people of Estonia are demanded. Concern is expressed over state budget reduction plans that could contract services in the counties.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The speaker advocates for state intervention and increased social spending to mitigate the effects of inflation and rising prices on family well-being. This support is viewed as an investment (for instance, in the viability of islands), rather than a cost. They oppose increasing the co-payment burden on families (for school lunches and extracurricular activities) and favor supporting local producers through public procurement processes (specifically for school meals).