By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

The confrontation is intense and directed at several ministers. Jürgen Ligi was criticized solely for his personal behavior, misogyny, and anti-women insults, with a long list of specific quotes being presented. The Minister of Finance was criticized for underestimating the role of parliament and disparaging the quality of the debate. The government as a whole is suspected of making illegal decisions in the context of reducing the influence of the Moscow Patriarchate.

The primary opposition is aimed at the draft legislation initiated by the Government of the Republic and the transposition of European Union directives, particularly concerning sustainability reporting. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on issues of bureaucracy, costs, and sovereignty. The faction of the Estonian Conservative People’s Party proposed rejecting the draft amendment to the Accounting Act during the first reading.

The opposition is directed at the minister and the government's policy concerning the outsourcing of prison capacity. The criticism is policy-based, calling into question the project's feasibility and the safeguarding of human rights, while citing the differing laws and regulations of the host countries. The intensity of the criticism is strong, given that the project is being called a failure right from the outset.

The criticism is directed at the executive branch (the minister) because he failed to provide a clear answer regarding the scope of the taxation. The opposition is procedural and focused on policy clarity, rather than being personal.

The main adversary is the governing coalition and the minister, whose policies (tax hikes, excise duties) are being criticized both politically and ideologically. The criticism is intense, calling into question the government's commitment to the market economy and referencing the statements made by a coalition partner (Lauri Läänemets).

The confrontation is aimed at the minister and the government's policy, criticizing both the substance of the social policy and its procedural shortcomings. The criticism is intense and focuses on the negative consequences of specific legislative amendments for mothers' health and employment. The opponents are accused of cruelty and failing to conduct impact assessments.

The primary opposition is aimed at the Reform Party and the ruling coalition, who are accused of ignoring and exacerbating the demographic crisis through the cutting of family benefits and the increasing of immigration quotas. The criticism is intense and partly personal, pointing to the negative rhetoric of ministers and the honorary chairman of the Reform Party regarding children and large families. The speaker sees the government's actions as prioritizing the interests of entrepreneurs over national sustainability.

The primary criticism is aimed at the minister and the government, who stand accused of poor planning and budget management. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, focusing specifically on the absence of concrete deadlines and the chronic underfunding of the road network. The intensity of the attack is high, strongly suggesting that the government is delivering empty promises.