By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

Insufficient data. The speaker's focus is on asking questions and criticizing ministers; there are no references to cooperation, willingness to compromise, or cross-party activity.

The speaker refers to a colleague's previous question, which indicates that the debate is being followed and reacted to. Significant cooperation is taking place within the faction, as the proposal to reject the draft bill is being submitted on behalf of the parliamentary group of the Conservative People's Party of Estonia. There is no data available regarding cross-party cooperation.

The speech is purely critical and raises questions; there is no evidence of cooperation, willingness to compromise, or inter-party collegiality.

Following the minister's unsuccessful attempt, the speaker approaches the committee rapporteur, expressing a desire to seek answers within the bounds of the legislative process. This suggests a willingness to utilize alternative legislative channels to acquire the required information.

Not enough data.

Insufficient data.

The draft resolution for the special committee stipulates the inclusion of one member from each faction, which suggests a formal openness to inter-factional cooperation within the committee's work. However, the speaker’s rhetoric toward the government partners is sharply confrontational, as he admits that he sees no support for his initiative in the chamber.

Insufficient data.