By Plenary Sessions: Evelin Poolamets

Insufficient data.

The economic views expressed show opposition to the proposed taxation (the car tax), arguing that it burdens socially vulnerable groups. The speaker criticizes the spending priorities that favor expensive solutions (electric cars) at the expense of social justice.

The economic views are distinctly pro-business, emphasizing opposition to legislative amendments that increase the administrative burden and costs for entrepreneurs. Impact assessments are required to evaluate the economic cost of proposed legislation and prevent negative effects on business operations.

Economic perspectives center on reforming the budget structure and fiscal responsibility. The speaker questions the capacity of the activity-based budget to find surpluses, pointing to the necessity for clearer and more efficient budgeting. The focus is on the systemic level of public finance management.

Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal responsibility, transparency, and identifying areas for savings within the state budget. There is criticism directed at the system that permits the payment of tax-free salary supplements, arguing that this contradicts the principles of tax efficiency and fair business practices (often comparing it to under-the-table payments). Furthermore, there is support for ensuring that public funds are spent in alignment with the public interest.

Economic perspectives focus on the stability of electricity prices and fair competition in the energy market. The speaker demands that pricing must account for all costs, including storage capabilities and regulatory mechanisms necessary for handling intermittent energy consumption. He emphasizes the necessity of supporting technologies that guarantee stable security of supply and fairer pricing.