By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The rhetorical style is highly combative, dramatic, and urgent, employing powerful metaphors (e.g., "modern command economy," "our Ruhr is being dismantled"). It relies on emotional appeals, describing the ruination and deindustrialization of the economy, and contrasts this approach with logical arguments regarding taxes and economic growth. The criticism is also extended to academics and state analysts who support the government's narrative.

The rhetorical style is critical, skeptical, and concerned, using data and rhetorical questions to emphasize the seriousness of the decline in productivity. Specific, slightly ironic examples ("tongue-tied Central Asian taxi drivers") are used to create emotional impact. The final conclusion is contradictory and resolute: "Nothing indicates this. Quite the opposite."

The rhetorical style is insistent, anxious, and accusatory, employing emotional and strong expressions (e.g., "serious concern," "drug capital"). The speaker relies primarily on personal testimony and anecdotal evidence, concluding with a direct plea for the situation to be alleviated ("How would you comfort me in this situation?").

The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, respectfully addressing both the chairperson and the presenter. The tone is critical but focuses on logical argumentation and presents a direct challenge by inquiring about the reasons for disregarding the alternative.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, accusatory, and emotional, employing strong expressions such as "stunning" and "absurd fabrication." The speaker poses direct questions and uses rhetorical hyperbole to underscore their shock regarding the government's actions. Personal attacks are also utilized, referring to the minister's previous claim about their ethnic origin as a "skeleton in the closet."