By Plenary Sessions: Anti Poolamets

The speaker is open to discussing alternative options, specifically asking the presenter whether consideration has been given to requiring electoral alliances to adopt mandatory NGO status or establishing a minimum membership threshold. This indicates a readiness to consider compromises and structured political solutions.

The speaker referenced Henn Põlluaas’s remarks approvingly and urged the deputies to support the submitted draft legislation, which highlights the cooperation among the bill’s initiators. He emphasized the shared goal of supporting an Estonian-speaking Estonia and the state language. There was no evident openness to compromise with the opposing side.

Not enough data.

The collaborative approach focuses on mobilizing existing structures (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, parliamentary diplomacy, friendship groups) to increase Estonia's contribution to international advocacy and pressure. It is emphasized that this issue should concern all countries that respect international law, pointing to the need to appeal to the conscience of difficult partners (e.g., China) as well.

Insufficient data.

The style of cooperation is oppositional, but the speaker expresses hope that the discussion points proposed by the government (demographics, education) will draw in another coalition party. He believes that the EKRE draft bill will find significantly more supporters in the chamber in the future, citing the potential for seeking support on specific issues.

There is no evidence of cooperation or a willingness to compromise; the speaker is taking a strictly oppositional and demanding stance. The speaker is demanding concrete steps and intervention from the government and the prime minister, rather than offering collaboration in finding solutions.

Not enough data.