By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

The main opponent is the Reform Party government and its representatives (including Jürgen Ligi), who are accused of a "tax hike spree" and favoring large corporations. The criticism is intense, focusing both on political decisions (tax increases, privatization) and procedural shortcomings (the swift removal of interest groups from the committee). The government is being called the special representative of large corporations.

The primary criticism is aimed at the governing coalition, particularly the Reform Party, which is accused of ignoring issues related to e-elections and suppressing parallels drawn with Russia. The criticism is both intense and procedural, implying that the government fails to recognize a problem that is clearly evident.

The speaker is in strong opposition to the Reform Party government, forcefully criticizing their omnibus tax increases and fiscal policy as unacceptable to the majority of Estonians. The criticism targets both the political decisions and the prime minister's conduct, accusing her of having a victim mentality and demanding that the decisions be reversed.

There are no direct opponents, but the repeated demands for a vote indicate procedural opposition or obstacles that the speaker is attempting to overcome. The criticism is procedural in nature, rather than politically substantive or personal.

The primary criticism is levelled against the government and the coalition, who stand accused of 'harboring a desire for a soft dictatorship' and implementing dangerous taxation logic. The criticism is both intense and philosophical, addressing the fundamental nature and goals of the government's activities, not merely the content of the policy itself.