By Plenary Sessions: Siim Pohlak

Insufficient data.

The primary conflict is aimed at the government and its ministers, particularly concerning fiscal and infrastructure policy. The criticism is policy-based (unfair taxation, changes to the Rail Baltic project) and procedural (calling Eurostat data into question). The speaker expresses deep dissatisfaction, accusing the government of avarice and hypocrisy regarding environmental protection.

The opposition is directed at the government’s education policy, particularly the plan to consolidate the school network, which is widely considered short-sighted. The criticism is political, focusing on the government’s failure to adopt a long-term regional policy perspective and offer solutions that would encourage population settlement and distribution.

There is no direct confrontation, but the first statement includes criticism regarding the inadequacy of state procedures and the uncertainty in identifying responsibility during package inspection. The criticism is procedural and focuses on risks arising from negligence.

The primary targets of criticism are state institutions that have refused to take on an oversight role over the prosecutor's office, including the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Justice. The criticism is aimed at the institutions' inaction and their reluctance to resolve systemic issues concerning citizens' rights.

The opposition stance is directed against the governments led by the Reform Party, criticizing them for shortcomings in family policy and a lack of control over the costs associated with Rail Baltic. The Prime Minister is accused of avoiding necessary political action and making overly emotional statements that generate uncertainty among young people.