By Months: Siim Pohlak

Total Months: 7

Fully Profiled: 7

09.2025

2 Speeches

There is insufficient data.
06.2025

1 Speeches

The main social theme under discussion is the support and sustainability of major cultural events and traditions (Viljandi Folk). Emphasis is placed on the role of cultural organizers and the necessity of protecting them.
05.2025

18 Speeches

The speaker is vehemently opposed to the forceful imposition of gender quotas on boards, stressing that competence and expertise must take precedence. He/She is also a strong opponent of mass immigration, criticizing the "globalist approach" and warning against repeating the failed migration policies of Western Europe.
04.2025

5 Speeches

The main social issue is population security and the support of large families, which is directly linked to the country’s defense capability. There is a demand for a positive program and significant benefits for families with many children, alongside criticism of the government for the heavy taxation imposed on large families.
03.2025

7 Speeches

Views on social issues are conservative: they support increasing the birth rate (citing Hungary's success) and demand that the immigration quota be reduced to zero. Concern and opposition are expressed regarding mandatory diversity quotas being implemented in corporate governing bodies, following the example of progressive countries, preferring competence over identity-based recruitment.
02.2025

4 Speeches

The speaker adopts a strict nationalistic stance on the issue of voting rights, demanding that suffrage be restricted exclusively to Estonian citizens. This position is justified by the need for national dignity and the preservation of the Estonian nation, language, and culture throughout the ages.
01.2025

14 Speeches

The speaker discusses social issues within the context of tax increases, highlighting how the proposed car tax specifically disadvantages large families and low-income earners. He also raises the need for control mechanisms concerning temporary protection recipients to prevent them from drawing benefits while they are staying abroad. Furthermore, he mentions opposition to the "gay spectacle/agenda" in connection with his criticism of government policy.