By Months: Siim Pohlak

The political position is strongly oppositional, centering on criticism of the actions of the Reform Party government. The main demands are the complete abolition of the car tax and opposition to the agreement on renting prison places in Sweden, which is viewed as a socio-liberal experiment and evidence of the poor state of the national budget. The focus is on the government's weak performance and a value-based opposition to migration policy.

The political stance is strongly anti-government, focusing on the deficiencies in the government's actions and lack of transparency. The primary focus has been placed on communication crises, such as the "tanker incident" and a recent event, which, according to surveys, have led to a decline in the trust of the Estonian people. This is criticism heavily aimed at the government's performance, demanding immediate honesty and the disclosure of information.

The political position centers on the necessity of making adjustments to the current situation, which poses a threat to cultural organizers and major events, such as the Viljandi Folk Festival. The stance is strongly reform-minded and aimed at mitigating practical consequences. The focus is results-oriented, stressing that even certain political actors (Mr. Ossinovski) are taking a hit due to the prevailing circumstances.

The political stance is fiercely anti-government and focuses on economic injustice, particularly concerning tax hikes and high prices. The speaker opposes market concentration, globalist immigration policies, and the forceful imposition of gender quotas. These positions are strongly value- and results-based, and they accuse the government of damaging the Estonian economy and lying.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the protection of the Estonian people and national security. The speaker vigorously supports social benefits for large families and population growth, and opposes e-elections, viewing them as a security threat. In energy policy, an independent course is demanded, one that relies on oil shale and a network of decentralized combined heat and power (CHP) plants, rejecting the blind implementation of Brussels directives. The political framework is deeply value-based (centered on the Estonian people) and highly critical of the government’s actions.

The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on sharp criticism of the government's economic policy and energy issues. The main topics include the price of energy, boosting the birth rate, and a zero immigration quota. The policy framing is results-oriented, emphasizing the government's inability to solve critical economic problems. Their positions are strong and uncompromising, especially concerning immigration and energy policy.

The political focus is centered on strong criticism of the government's energy policy, demanding swift and tangible solutions to bring soaring electricity prices under control. Another key point of view is national dignity, stressing that the right to vote must remain strictly the privilege of Estonian citizens. The criticism is primarily aimed at the government's inaction and lack of planning.

The speaker is fiercely opposed to the Reform Party-led government, accusing them of causing the economic downturn, incompetence, and short-sightedness. He stresses the necessity of maintaining energy security using domestic oil shale energy and sharply rejects all tax hikes (VAT, car tax), which, in his view, penalize the public and deepen poverty. The political framework is heavily performance-driven, focusing on the repercussions of the government’s "stupid decisions."