By Plenary Sessions: Heljo Pikhof

The style is predominantly formal and procedural, particularly concerning the committee representative, who submits an objective and detailed report regarding the committee's debate and voting outcomes. The questioner’s style is direct and critical, challenging the motivation of the bill’s initiator for increasing the fine amounts.

The rhetorical style is analytical, concerned, and forward-looking, emphasizing the importance of education for the survival of the state and the nation. Numerous logical arguments and references to studies are employed, while maintaining a formal and serious tone. It appeals both to reason (through data) and to values (by elevating the honor of the teaching profession).