By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Mölder

The style is formal, critical, and analytical, focusing on logical and procedural arguments regarding transparency and the propriety of officials' actions. The speaker poses direct and pointed questions to the minister, using critical terminology to characterize the communication of the Competition Authority (e.g., "biased prior communication" and "teasers"). Initially, he asks the session chair to ensure order during the Riigikogu proceedings, which demonstrates an insistence on maintaining decorum.

The rhetorical style is formal, procedural, and exacting, focusing on specific issues and deadlines. The tone is critical of delays, and the argumentation is primarily logical and fact-based, repeatedly referencing the submission dates of the inquiry and the obligations arising from legislation.

The style is analytical, formal, and concerned, particularly regarding the proliferation of the black market, which is considered an acute problem. Logical arguments and historical examples (the alcohol excise tax in Latvia, the legalization of snus) are used to illustrate regulatory failures. The speaker stresses the need for a more substantive and detailed analysis in the minister's replies.