By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Mölder

The main criticism is directed at the Competition Authority, citing incorrect communication and bias in the analysis, because the document was not released to market participants or politicians. Furthermore, there is criticism regarding a potential conflict of interest, as the person responsible for the reform (Maris Jesse) is now compiling the analysis of that very reform, prompting the question of whether this constitutes self-auditing. The criticism is procedural and focuses on transparency.

The confrontation is directed against the actions of the Minister of Climate (Kristen Michal) and the ruling coalition, criticizing the stalling and delays in the preparation of development plans. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, demanding accountability and specific deadlines from the minister, especially concerning the absence of the Forestry Development Plan since 2020.

Criticism is aimed at the government's regulatory decisions, which have created fertile ground for the emergence of the black market and resulted in the state losing potential tax revenue. The government is also facing criticism regarding its energy policy, with warnings that the state should not be making decisions based solely on the interests of a single private company. Furthermore, the criticism targets the inefficiency of the policy and the significant shortcomings in oversight within the jurisdiction of the Ministry of the Interior.