By Months: Tõnis Mölder
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
10.2025
5 Speeches
The criticism is directed at the government’s budget policy and the transparency of financial management within state-owned enterprises. The speaker questions the sustainability of RMK dividends and the proportionality of infrastructure charges paid by the state to itself. The criticism is strictly policy- and procedure-based.
06.2025
1 Speeches
A strong and ironic opposition is leveled against the Social Democrats, whose motives and concerns the speaker publicly questions, asking exactly what their underlying problem is. This criticism is more rhetorical and personal in nature, rather than a direct, substantive attack on policy.
05.2025
5 Speeches
The criticism targets both the previous government's draft bill (which was deemed to be distorting the legal system) and the opposing side's claims, voiced in the chamber, regarding the great indignation felt by entrepreneurs. Opponents are being refuted with institutional opinions and facts, specifically highlighting the support of the Chancellor of Justice and various business organizations. The criticism is policy-based and fact-based.
01.2025
1 Speeches
There is no direct opposition, but the speaker corrects a historical inaccuracy presented by others regarding the timeline for the start of the Tallinn Hospital idea. The criticism is procedural and fact-based, not a personal attack against a political opponent.
12.2024
1 Speeches
The criticism is aimed at the bill proposed by the government, as business owners consider it impractical and note that it only applies to a limited number of new projects. The opposition is rooted in policy and procedure, arguing that the bill mainly serves to reduce the workload of officials rather than providing assistance to entrepreneurs.
11.2024
5 Speeches
The criticism is primarily aimed at the political insincerity and the inter-factional "theater" evident in the constitutional amendment debates. The speaker criticizes the accumulation of political points at the expense of national consensus, specifically referencing the coalition and the opposition constantly trying to hog the blanket.
07.2024
2 Speeches
The speaker is acting as a critical questioner, challenging the new coalition’s capacity to resolve complex legislative issues, particularly concerning the Competition Act, where the previous coalition failed. The criticism targets political accountability and procedural uncertainty.
06.2024
1 Speeches
The criticism is directed at the session chair or the secretariat due to the inaccurate reporting of the voting result. This is a procedural correction that does not involve intense attacks or political opposition.
01.2024
10 Speeches
Criticism is aimed at the government and its administrative branches, especially the Ministry of the Interior and the Tax and Customs Board for their failure to control the black market for e-cigarettes. The Minister of Climate is also criticized for delays in development plans, and the Competition Authority for biased prior communication. The criticism is primarily policy- and procedure-focused, demanding greater transparency and better enforcement.