By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Mölder

The main indirect criticism is aimed at the inefficiency of local governments, particularly the City of Tallinn, in handling detailed planning applications, which has caused processes to drag on for up to two decades. The criticism is procedural and focuses on deficiencies in administrative capacity, which results in costs for businesses.

The criticism is aimed at the government's fiscal policy decisions, particularly concerning the dividends from RMK (State Forest Management Centre) and the forecasting of budget revenues. The opposition is policy- and procedure-based, demanding explanations and justifications rather than resorting to personal attacks. The intensity is moderate, focusing on demanding accountability.