By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Mölder

The speaker himself does not voice opposition; rather, he relays the conflicting positions that emerged within the committee. The primary tension lies between the desire to reduce bureaucracy (held by the initiators of the bill) and the emphasis placed on the positive impact and international credibility of sustainability reports (stressed by ministry representatives).

The speaker is taking a stand against colleagues in the chamber who have been circulating claims about widespread indignation among entrepreneurs regarding the new draft bill. Specifically, colleague Priit Sibul’s reference to the Chancellor of Justice’s opinion is being challenged, with the speaker demonstrating that the actual support is contrary to what was claimed. The criticism is aimed at the factual inaccuracy of the opposition’s assertions.