By Agendas: Tõnis Mölder

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the field of planning law, covering the deadlines for processing detailed spatial plans, the initiation procedure, and the implementation of design specifications. They are highly knowledgeable about practical issues arising from changes in land use designation and conflicts between comprehensive plans and detailed spatial plans. Furthermore, they are up-to-date on technical subjects discussed by the commission, such as factoring in climate change and nationwide thematic plans.

The speaker demonstrates a strong command of public finance, the dividend policy of state-owned enterprises, and the financing of major infrastructure projects. Specific budgetary figures (1.87 million euros) and technical terminology, such as "clearing right fee" and "forest assets," are employed. Particular emphasis is placed on the necessity of differentiating between fees paid by the state into the national budget and the contributions made by private investors.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the legislative drafting process and legal issues, focusing specifically on the protection of fundamental rights and their interference. Technical terms such as "interference with fundamental rights" are employed, and reference is made to the volume of amendments submitted by the ministry between the first and second readings.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the procedural rules and committee work of the Riigikogu, referencing specific session dates, consensus decisions, and the requirements stipulated in Section 103 of the Constitution. They possess knowledge of terminology related to European Union policy (the Green Deal) and financial regulation (sustainability reports). This expertise is focused more on process management and conveying the dynamics of the discussion rather than on substantive policy analysis.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of competition law and the history of processing draft legislation, referring both to committee discussions and to the previous draft bill. This knowledge is substantiated by citing institutional opinions (legal scholars from the University of Tartu, the Chancellor of Justice, business organizations). The primary authority concerns the draft bill's compliance with the Estonian legal order.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the history and development plans of Estonian hospitals, highlighting the 2000 document compiled by Swedish scientists and the initial mention of the Lasnamäe hospital. They use specific historical references and dates to correct the public understanding of the project’s inception.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the procedural processes for renewable energy developments, differentiating between ongoing and new projects. This expertise is based on direct communication with renewable energy providers and developers, whose critiques he conveys in parliament.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in international climate policy, referencing the Green Deal and the actions of China, the USA, and the European Commission. This analysis centers on the failure of policy implementation, examining whether the fault lies in goal setting or in communication. Volatile weather conditions resulting from global warming are also mentioned.

The speaker demonstrates competence in parliamentary procedure and the legislative process, citing their extensive parliamentary experience and familiarity with legal challenges concerning the promulgation of legislation. They stress the procedural requirements for constitutional amendments, noting their awareness of the deliberations within the Council of Elders and the necessity of achieving broad consensus.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the legal and procedural aspects of the bill's implementation, emphasizing the necessity of legal analysis. Specific terminology is used, such as "the position of the Chancellor of Justice," "considerations for the President," and "implementation bottlenecks," indicating a deep dive into the legal details.

The speaker demonstrates competence in the field of legislation, citing the specifics of the draft Competition Act and the criticism leveled by the Chancellor of Justice and other legal experts. Furthermore, the speaker is familiar with the prime ministerial candidate's earlier positions from 2022 regarding the issue of suffrage. The speaker also acknowledges the candidate's previous work in the environmental sector.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in monitoring the Riigikogu's rules of procedure and voting processes, focusing on comparing the results displayed on the screen with those announced orally, and the accuracy of the official transcript.

The speaker demonstrates competence regarding the oversight of government agencies and communication procedures, highlighting the differing disclosure practices of the Competition Authority and the National Audit Office. The professional focus centers on the methodology for analyzing the long-term effects of the pharmacy reform and compliance with transparency requirements. Furthermore, detailed questions were posed concerning the previous role and current employment relationships of officials (Maris Jesse).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of strategic development plans and legislation, distinguishing between the Climate Act and development plans that provide a comprehensive overview. It is emphasized that these development plans must be linked to Estonia’s 2030 and 2050 climate targets. Furthermore, they are aware of which documents require the approval of the Government of the Republic and which require the approval of the Riigikogu (Parliament).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in excise policy and the dynamics of the black market, drawing on specific examples from Estonia’s recent history (the shift of alcohol excise to Latvia, and the legalization of snus). They are well-versed in the specifics of the e-cigarette market, including flavor and scent bans, and the importation of products across the border via e-commerce. Emphasis is placed on the role of the Tax and Customs Board (MTA) and the police in carrying out oversight.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of energy planning, referencing the timeline for the completion of a nuclear power plant (15–20 years) and using the specific term "dispatchable capacity." They are also aware of the nuclear working group's report and the plans for closing oil shale boilers. The necessity of a national analysis for a broader debate is emphasized.