By Plenary Sessions: Vladimir Arhipov

The speaker supports increasing the financial autonomy of local governments and providing state support to cover the growing costs faced by local authorities. He advocates for granting municipalities autonomy over the land tax and inquires about the possibilities of restoring the sharing of personal income tax and establishing local taxes (such as a sales tax), referencing the experience of the 1990s.

He/She criticizes the government's austerity policy, arguing that it targets the wrong sectors. He/She stresses the importance of investment cooperation and economic relations, especially given New York’s status as a global financial hub. He/She believes the costs of maintaining the consulate do not justify closing it down.

It supports a more active role for the state in social spending and criticizes austerity measures. It expresses concern about the simultaneous declaration of a tax freeze (or fiscal stability) alongside budget cuts. It advocates for increased state funding in education and the pension system. Its economic views are distinctly redistributive.

Based on this data, it's impossible to draw any conclusions regarding economic views.

Supports the increase in defense spending and solidarity funding, acknowledging that even 5% of GDP may not be sufficient. It demonstrates a readiness for significant defense expenditures.

Emphasizes the importance of budget transparency and responsible finance. Expresses concern over the disappearance of public funds and calls for clearer control over state financial resources.

The text emphasizes the importance of economic policy within the context of national defense, arguing that individuals with higher incomes are more willing to contribute to national defense efforts. It points out that consumer confidence in Estonia is the lowest in Europe, and urges the government to improve both incomes and the overall quality of life. Furthermore, it supports the optimal and efficient use of defense spending.

There is not enough data.