By Months: Vladimir Arhipov

It raises questions about social cohesion, criticizing the disenfranchisement of certain groups of people. It asks whether these people, who should be integrated, are not considered part of society. It expresses concern about the impact of the rise in alcohol excise duty, claiming that this could lead to "moonshining." It emphasizes the need to keep society together as a whole.

It focuses on protecting vulnerable groups, particularly supporting pensioners, large families, and low-income earners. It criticizes benefit cuts and calls for a more targeted social policy. It expresses concern over the drug problem and demands stricter measures. It supports the right of non-citizens to vote in local elections, calling the revocation of this right discrimination.

It focuses intensely on the well-being and quality of life of retirees, comparing the situation in Estonia to the Swedish system. It supports the funding of pensioners' associations and their participation in societal organizations. Furthermore, it expresses concern regarding women's safety in the political environment.

Strongly defends the education system, especially extracurricular activities and the funding of school meals, highlighting their critical importance for children from low-income families. Expresses concern regarding the situation of pensioners following cuts to indexation. Warns against negative signals in integration policy, particularly in the context of revoking voting rights, which could deepen societal divisions. Stresses the necessity of protecting the interests of the most vulnerable groups.

The speaker mentioned supporting large families and people with disabilities through car tax exemptions, thereby demonstrating social sensitivity. He/She supported the creation of simpler, less bureaucratic solutions specifically for these groups. There is insufficient data available regarding other social issues.