By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The primary opposition is aimed at Minister Jürgen Ligi, who is being criticized for the philosophical belittling of parliament. The criticism is intense and procedural, asserting that such conduct must result in a motion of no confidence. The opposition focuses on the government member's attitude toward the legislative branch.

The criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, focusing on political and procedural deficiencies, particularly the ambiguous distribution of powers and the inefficient use of budget funds during the crisis. The opposition is policy-driven, questioning the legal foundation and economic viability of the reforms.

The main criticism is aimed at the government and ministers (including Prime Minister Kristen Michal), criticizing their tax policy and the alleged continuation of the "tax festival." The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the reduction of the local government revenue base, the violation of autonomy, and the mandatory increase of the land tax.

The opposition is aimed at the government's economic philosophy, which presupposes adapting to high input costs (electricity, fuel). The criticism is policy-driven, warning that this approach damages the economic space and will result in manufacturing leaving Estonia.

There is no direct confrontation or personal criticism, but the speaker is indirectly criticizing the current social welfare system for being overly focused on institutional care centers. The criticism is aimed at structural shortcomings, not specific individuals.