By Plenary Sessions: Andres Metsoja

The economic perspective is critical of current fiscal policy, specifically opposing a tax that is considered unfair and creates inequality. It is emphasized that the state should provide frequent public transportation in rural areas before implementing taxes that influence the choice of residence. Furthermore, taxation places families with differing needs in an unequal position.

The speaker supports the development of the circular economy but stresses that investments should be directed towards industrial development (factories), not merely collection infrastructure (containers). He defends the interests of the private sector, demanding legitimate expectation and predictability, and criticizes regulations that distort the market and give an advantage to the state-owned company (Enefit) in the utilization of oil shale resources.

The speaker is clearly critical of taxation, specifically opposing the motor vehicle tax as an unfair levy that must be abolished. They criticize the state intervention that attempts to mitigate the negative consequences of a tax it itself imposed, citing a desire to avoid excessive governmental interference in economic life.

Economic perspectives emphasize budgetary discipline and transparency in state spending. The speaker sharply criticizes the situation where planned development funds remain unspent and are simply dispersed at the end of the year, underscoring the demand for responsible and predictable budget execution.