By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The rhetorical style is analytical, questioning, and slightly critical, highlighting the necessity of rationality over emotional debate. It employs sharp rhetorical analogies (for example, comparing support for SMRs to liking "small, furry, cute animals") and focuses on logical arguments and the absence of objective information.

The style is formal, analytical, and measured, addressing problems within a broader context (the frenzied pace of development in science and technology, the limitation of resources). The speaker uses logical arguments and emphasizes the complexity of the problems, describing the situation as a "strange world" and an "eternal cycle." He/She is appreciative of the presenters but poses critical questions regarding the environmental impact of agriculture.

The style is formal and polite, beginning with an acknowledgment of the minister ("thank you for the excellent figures"), but quickly shifting to an analytical and questioning approach. Logical argumentation is employed, highlighting the integration of the economy and the environment, and concluding with a direct and substantive question about how environmental impact is being considered.

The language used is formal and analytical, focusing on logical and procedural arguments. The speaker employs a cautionary tone and rhetorical questions to emphasize the need for thorough consideration, highlighting the proverb "the wise man hurries slowly" and the warning that "the old devil might hide in the small details."