By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

There is no direct opposition, but the speaker questions the accuracy and sufficiency of the claims presented by the presenter, demanding specific quantitative evidence. The criticism is directed toward the inadequacy of facts and data, rather than individuals or procedures.

On the topic of identity, he criticizes the fundamental basis of the arguments made by proponents of removing the monument, calling into question the assertion that removal is a prerequisite for identity to be taken seriously. Regarding environmental issues, the current system is indirectly criticized—a system where used water is disposed of while the economy continues to utilize clean resources.