By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The analysis demonstrates expertise in evaluating energy policy and associated costs, citing specific data points (e.g., the fivefold cost of offshore wind farms compared to onshore installations, the estimated startup cost of a nuclear power plant at 160 million euros). Furthermore, the individual is well-versed in regulations governing local government financing, revenue base, and land tax, requesting clarification on the percentage increases for the land tax rate.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of legislative processes and timing, referencing the second reading of the motor vehicle tax, the delay surrounding the negative supplementary budget, and the postponement of the Nursipalu decision. The professional focus also includes mechanisms for landowners' rights and state budgetary compensation (financial indemnity or replacement land).

The speaker demonstrates expertise in renewable energy development, environmental impact assessment (EIA) methodology, and noise regulations. Technical terms such as "infrasound noise," "low-frequency noise," and "resonant frequencies" are employed, emphasizing that current Estonian standards do not account for lower frequency sounds. The expertise relies on citing scientific research and developments occurring worldwide to confirm the seriousness of the concerns.

The speaker demonstrates detailed knowledge regarding the establishment of offshore wind farms, the planning of power lines, and financial impacts, utilizing specific data and statistics. Particular emphasis is placed on the 330 kV power line protection zone (80–100 meters), the extent of associated deforestation (thousands of hectares), and the impact on properties (80,000). Economic comparisons are also presented (onshore parks are 5 times cheaper), along with the failure to account for nuclear power plant decommissioning costs in the case of wind farms.

The speaker demonstrates specific awareness in the field of land surveying and land management operations, utilizing technical terms like "re-surveying of cadastral units" and "implementation of detailed plans." They are up-to-date on the specific deadlines and consequences of the transition of the Land Board's information system, including the resulting loss of revenue for surveying bureaus.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of historical narratives (serfdom/servitude) and the procedural details of the Riigikogu (Estonian Parliament), referencing the decision of the Cultural Affairs Committee and the initiated draft legislation. Security policy terminology is also employed, citing the recommendations of the Internal Security Service (KAPO) within the opposing side's arguments. There are no references to specific data or statistics.

The speaker demonstrates awareness of security policy mechanisms, such as the revocation of voting rights for Russian citizens and the declaration of the Moscow Patriarchate as a war-supporting institution. The need for concrete evidence regarding the alleged activities of Russian special services is emphasized. Technical terminology or statistical data are not used, focusing instead on political argumentation.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of financial regulations and the mechanisms generating extraordinary profits within the banking sector, utilizing terms such as Euribor and central bank. Furthermore, they are familiar with the legislative procedure, criticizing the bundling of legal amendments and the incompetent conduct of the respondents. They also demonstrate the ability to compare different business sectors (banking versus car sales) in the context of regulatory benefit.