By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing
The criticism is leveled directly at the prime minister and the government, addressing both administrative decisions (such as changing ministry names and creating confusion) and procedural opacity (unanswered questions). The attacks focus on the government's inefficiency and costly tactics.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opposition is directed against Mario Kadastik, a member of the Economic Affairs Committee, and the energy policy of the previous government (the Social Democrats), accusing them of changing their positions and causing market distortion. The criticism is sharp and policy-based, claiming that the subsidization is ideological and beneficial to certain entrepreneurs engaged in lobbying. Opponents are accused of hypocrisy in connection with climate goals and the CO2 emissions generated on the battlefield.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, press briefing.
The main opponent is the government led by the Prime Minister and its fiscal policy, which is suspected of secretly inflating expenditures. The criticism focuses on the policy's inefficiency and the procedures that, instead of delivering the promised cuts, actually increase bureaucracy and costs. The speaker is demanding a specific and substantive response from the government, making it clear that the issue is not the possibility of compromise, but rather the government's integrity.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the Reform Party, who is sharply criticized for their core political tenet of shifting blame onto others. Criticism is also aimed at the Sotsid (Social Democrats) and EKREIKE as former accomplices, and at Eesti 200 as a future potential culprit, should things go wrong.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary backlash is aimed at the government and politicians who, following their failures, are attempting to cover their tracks and are refusing to establish an investigative commission. The criticism is intense and focuses specifically on procedural failures (avoiding accountability) and political failures (wasting taxpayer money). Opponents are being accused of committing blunders and concealing criminal decisions.