By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The criticism targets the government or the parliamentary majority, which systematically rejects bills introduced by the opposition. Emphasis is placed on procedural injustice, which prevents the opposition from either improving existing legislation or creating new laws.

The primary criticism targets the government and the prime minister, who stand accused of pursuing an economy-damaging "tax-the-rich" policy and ignoring the realities on the ground. Legislative rapporteurs are also criticized for obstructing assistance to specific business sectors (such as hauliers) by demanding solutions that are unreasonably complex.

The criticism is aimed at the government and the minister, faulting them both for the protracted handling of the parliamentary inquiry and for ineffective policy, particularly the withdrawal of investments from electricity grids. The criticism is intense and focuses on inaction and the unrealistic planning of the green transition, which fails to take into account the actual condition of the networks.

There is not enough data.

The criticism is aimed at coalition members and committees who reject opposition draft legislation solely on the basis of political affiliation. The objection is both procedural and ethical, accusing the opposing side of a lack of statesmanship and of wasting legislative time. They specifically criticize the pursuit of the "third dimension" (ideology) rather than focusing on substantive issues.