By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Läänemets

Economic perspectives stress the unavoidable cost of investments and the need for fiscal realism, in opposition to the concept of developing "free" energy. Warnings are issued that the absence of a holistic vision in the energy sector will prove extremely costly for both the economy and the public, pointing to higher balancing and synchronization charges.

Economic perspectives stress the necessity of investing in the wages of cultural workers, standing in opposition to austerity measures. The speaker voiced concern over the repayment of future national debt (specifically defense loans), which will further complicate financing for the social and cultural sectors. He dismisses the notion that cultural work lacks value.

Economic views are strongly pro-labor, opposing regulations that diminish workers' financial security and social benefits. State investments in human capital and lifelong learning are supported as a source of economic added value and innovation. Criticism is leveled at the government's change of direction regarding the transition toward a smarter, technology-based economy.

Economic perspectives strongly favor labor protection, opposing regulations that grant employers unilateral decision-making power over wages. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of guaranteeing workers a stable income and financial security to ensure they can maintain their standard of living and creditworthiness.

Insufficient data.

Economic perspectives emphasize the necessity of maintaining job security and income stability for employees, opposing greater regulatory freedom for employers. The stance heavily favors the workforce, warning that the draft bill increases employee vulnerability during an economic downturn and grants employers excessive authority to decide on wage reductions.