By Plenary Sessions: Irja Lutsar

The tone is fundamentally serious and concerned, emphasizing the scale of the economic crisis, but interactions with the servers are polite and respectful. With the second server, however, he uses a familiar tone and the informal 'you' (sinatamine), referring to them as "old acquaintances" (and stating, "I use the informal 'you' with you"). The speaker employs a rhetorical question to underscore the importance of his proposal regarding the establishment of an independent expert council.

The style is predominantly logical and persuasive, employing comparisons and legal arguments to justify the decision-making capacity of young people. The tone is encouraging and expresses confidence, calling on colleagues to trust the youth. In a brief rejoinder to Urmas Reinsalu, the style becomes sharp and challenging, accusing him of populism.

The rhetorical style is analytical, measured, and formal, focusing on logical arguments and historical and international examples. Examples drawn from Bollywood films and the coronavirus pandemic are used to illustrate social factors. The tone is rather optimistic, emphasizing that problems can be solved by changing society's mindset, rather than through coercion or pressure.

The rhetorical style is analytical and inquiry-based, beginning with a polite acknowledgment of the presentation. The speaker employs a logical line of argument, presenting a dilemma (living beyond one's means versus a labor surplus in other sectors) and concluding with a specific, data-driven question to deepen the discussion.

The rhetorical style is polite and constructive, beginning with praise for the minister's responses, emphasizing their calmness and strong argumentation. The question itself is posed more in the form of a hopeful hypothesis, focusing on the logical connection between educational choices and societal integration. The overall tone is formal and respectful.