By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The style is formal, analytical, and interrogative, directed straight at the President of the Bank of Estonia. The discourse is logical, focusing on demanding specific economic recommendations for reducing consumption and waste in the Estonian economy.

The rhetorical style is urgent and direct, encompassing both procedural criticism (demanding that the violation of law within the committees be the last occurrence) and empathetic support for the communities. Logical arguments are employed (population processes, unfairness of funding) alongside emotional appeals ("a matter of life and death"), demanding active intervention from the Riigikogu to address Estonia's needs.

The rhetorical style is critical, cautionary, and heavily data-driven, employing logical arguments concerning regulatory loopholes and wage levels. The speaker uses powerful metaphors ("cheating with wooden eggs") and appeals to fear regarding future security and social issues, citing negative examples from Sweden and Germany. The tone is formal, yet confrontational.

The style is critical, questioning, and detail-oriented, utilizing logical arguments and political facts (the number of exceptions, salary criteria). The tone is skeptical, referring to the minister's actions as something that remains "the most obscure," and concluding with a rhetorical question about the necessity of cheap labor.

The tone is critical, substantive, and occasionally admonishing, especially concerning the government's inaction on the teachers' salary issue, referring to the escalation to a strike as a "fiasco." It employs logical arguments and data but also includes sharp assessments ("impoverishment," "acting sloppily"). The style is formal, though it also contains acknowledgment for positive steps taken by the minister.