By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The criticism is primarily aimed at the minister and the government (Valitsus), accusing them of scaling back ambition, delaying amendments to the Language Act, and failing to deliver on promised salary increases for teachers. Separately, former Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev is criticized for the insufficient funding of activities outlined in the action plan. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, not personal.

There is no direct oppositional stance; the criticism is limited to the previous speaker's swift departure from the podium, which prevented a question from being asked. The main objective is to obtain explanations and support for their proposals from government authorities (the Minister, the Ministry of Climate).

Strong opposition to the policies of the government and the Ministry of Economic Affairs, especially regarding the plan to change the foreign labor quota. [The speaker/group] criticizes the government for ridiculing previous population policies but expresses satisfaction that the plan to amend the quota has been dropped, asserting that this happened under pressure from the opposition.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and the Reform Party, whose plan to allow people from anywhere to participate in local elections has met with fierce opposition. The criticism is both political (a regional policy blunder) and procedural, accusing the government of merely faking productivity and deceiving local residents.