By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The tone of the speech is critical, factual, and at times urgent, especially concerning the government's inaction and failure to deliver on promises. Formal language is employed, combining strong value-based appeals (the preservation of the cultural space, the public good) with specific political and procedural accusations (e.g., "fumbling/muddling," "substitute activity/busywork").

The style is formal and respectful, addressing both the minister and the rapporteur/presenter using phrases like "Honorable Chairman" and "Esteemed Rapporteur." The speaker employs direct and logical questions to clarify political stances and the definitions within the draft legislation. There is also a minor procedural complaint regarding the previous presenter's hasty departure ("gone in a flash").

The style is formal, critical, and relies heavily on logic, stressing direct causal links (for instance, cheap labor leads directly to emigration). It employs rhetorical questions to challenge the government's capacity to integrate new employees and provide them with language instruction. The tone is serious and deeply concerned, particularly regarding the long-term sustainability of society.

The rhetorical style is critical and insistent, combining logical analysis (the establishment of state institutions in Tallinn funded by all taxpayers) with emotional warnings (the loss of security, the withering of our roots). Figurative language is employed ("snowball," "guest performers"), alongside direct accusations aimed at the government, urging them to stop putting on a show and start doing their jobs.