By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

The criticism targets Russia's active influence operations and those local municipalities that are resisting the transition to Estonian-language education. The number of stateless persons who neither apply for Estonian citizenship nor learn the language is also criticized, as they are particularly susceptible to manipulation. This stance is policy- and value-based, centered on guaranteeing national security.

The main criticism is directed at the government, which is accused of having an overly lenient immigration policy and a desire to import cheap labor. The criticism is political and focuses on the inadequacy of the draft Language Act, as it does not include sufficient language requirements for service workers.

The primary adversaries are the proponents of increasing the quota, including the prime minister and employers who seek to drive down wage levels. The criticism is intense and focuses on political ideology and unfair economic motives that harm local workers.

The confrontation is aimed at the government and ministers, sharply criticizing the rushed process and insufficient preparation in carrying out crucial reforms. The criticism is primarily procedural and policy-based, accusing the government of prioritizing austerity over social priorities. Furthermore, those who deem issues of national culture unimportant are also being criticized.

The main confrontation is directed at the prime minister and the government’s policy regarding foreign labor, which is viewed as undercutting wage levels. Criticism is also aimed at cooperation with representatives of Eesti 200, who are mentioned as being enthusiastic about the introduction of foreign labor. The criticism is policy-based and intense, calling the government’s motives into question.