Agenda Profile: Tõnis Lukas
Draft Law on the Organisation of Research and Development Activities and Innovation (554 SE) - Second Reading
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
The political focus centers on the organization and funding of research and development (R&D). The speaker strongly supports the final version of the bill, emphasizing its maturity and the comprehensive analysis that underpins it. Criticism is directed at a previous negative tendency where funding for core scientific instruments proportionally decreased, and resources were scattered among various ministries based on vague parameters. The objective is to transition toward more coordinated and stable financing.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates authority in the field of science policy and funding, utilizing specific terminology such as "core instruments," "base funding," and "grant applications." Emphasis is placed on the importance of the explanatory memorandum in formalizing fundamental agreements and compromises, which reveals a deep understanding of the nuances of legislative drafting. Furthermore, knowledge of the domain of research ethics is also indicated.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is appreciative and conciliatory, praising those who participated in finalizing the draft bill and the compromises that were reached. The style is formal and analytical, focusing on logical arguments concerning the proportions of science funding and the necessity of coordination. The speaker expresses hope that the process will move forward toward "coordination and brotherly peace."
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker delivered a single speech during the second reading of the bill, emphasizing that the draft legislation had been under consideration for several years. There is no data available regarding his overall frequency of speaking or his patterns of activity.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is directed against previous opaque funding practices, where money was dispersed among ministries using questionable parameters and insufficient quality control. No specific individuals are named as direct adversaries; instead, the focus is on criticizing the negative tendency that created pressure on research teams.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasizes the need for cooperation and compromise in finalizing the law, while specifically recognizing Margit Sutrop's contribution as the chair of the Culture Committee. [The speaker] points to the successful agreement regarding the proportions of science funding, which demonstrates a readiness for broad-based cooperation and seeking consensus.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is on the organization of national research and development and on signals directed at internationally recognized research teams. Regional or local topics are absent.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
The economic views center on state investment in science, supporting stable and proportional funding channeled through core mechanisms. It criticizes the unreasonable scattering of funds among ministries, which indicates a desire to ensure clear quality control of activities and prevent waste.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
In terms of social issues, emphasis is placed on the necessity of providing security and clear signals to young researchers and internationally renowned teams. This is linked to the stability and appropriate levels of science funding, aimed at alleviating both financial and temporal pressures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative priority is the adoption of the Draft Act on the Organization of Research, Development, and Innovation (554 SE). The speaker is a strong proponent of the bill, acknowledging the maturity achieved during its preparation and the agreements reached concerning the proportions of science funding.
1 Speeches Analyzed