By Plenary Sessions: Maris Lauri

The style is predominantly formal and analytical, focusing on details and procedural rules. It employs strong logical arguments, but becomes sharp and combative towards the end, accusing the opposition of ignorance regarding the draft bill, hypocrisy, and demagoguery. It criticizes "baroque speeches" and emphasizes that it only speaks when fully informed on the subject.

The style is analytical, formal, and critical, yet it concludes with a call for cooperation. The speaker relies on logical arguments and structured analysis, evaluating the budget system five years after its implementation. To enhance credibility, he/she uses self-referencing (extensive experience on the finance committee, having reviewed all budgets) and agrees with the assessments made by the National Audit Office.