By Plenary Sessions: Maris Lauri

The style is predominantly formal and procedural, as the speaker acts as a representative of the commission, avoiding the expression of personal viewpoints. However, the tone becomes defensive and sharp in response to colleagues’ accusations ("you’re talking rubbish"), emphasizing that disagreements are a natural part of the legislative process. The arguments are primarily logical and fact-based, relying on commission decisions and legal interpretations.

The style is initially corrective and procedural, addressing a colleague's procedural error. The tone then shifts to questioning and inclusive, posing a specific question about the focus areas for the subsequent procedure. The communication is formal and focuses on logical facts.

The style is formal and analytical, while simultaneously employing colorful historical descriptions ("a colorful start," "stupid mistakes were made, wrongdoings were committed"). The tone is concerned regarding systemic risks and financial fraud, but ultimately optimistic about the system's improvement. Logical appeals and parallels are utilized (doctor, circulatory system), and the head of the Financial Supervision Authority is addressed respectfully.