By Plenary Sessions: Maris Lauri

The opposition stems from colleagues who questioned the constitutionality of the draft bill and issues related to data protection. The speaker sharply criticizes the colleague's claims ("you're talking nonsense/rubbish"), but defends the Riigikogu's right, as a legislator, to make choices. The intensity is moderate but resolute, stressing that a dispute with the President or the Supreme Court is a fundamental part of democracy and there is nothing to be ashamed of.

The criticism is aimed at a colleague who has demonstrated a lack of knowledge regarding the Riigikogu's procedural rules ("who has apparently forgotten how proceedings are handled..."). The objection is procedural and low-intensity, intended solely to establish the facts.

The criticism is aimed at malicious financial institutions and criminals, not political opponents. Strong criticism is directed at financial fraudsters whose activities are ruinous, as well as at credit unions where depositors' funds were maliciously mishandled. Historical "beep-beep" lenders are also being criticized.