By Plenary Sessions: Maris Lauri

The rhetorical style is highly formal, neutral, and procedural, serving as the purely informative transmission of the Finance Committee's discussions and decisions. Logical appeals and neutral reporting are utilized, while avoiding emotional expressions or personal viewpoints.

The style is highly factual, formal, and detailed, concentrating on clarifying the substance of the draft bill and the procedural process. The speaker remains patient and repetitive in addressing the opposition's recurring questions. Furthermore, the speaker employs logical arguments and technical language to alleviate concerns regarding the creation of a "super database" and the profiling of private individuals. He repeatedly emphasizes that all future decisions will continue to be made by a human, not a machine.

The speaker's style is formal, procedural, and fact-based, especially as a committee representative, focusing on the details of the bill’s procedure and relevant legislation. In personal remarks, the tone shifts to be more ideological, yet remains analytical and reliant on figures, while simultaneously acknowledging opponents (the Social Democrats) for their honesty. He/She uses a sharp but brief remark directed at the opposition, referring to "long, drawn-out questions."

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and interrogative, directed straight to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. A logical appeal is utilized, presenting a complex legal dilemma and emphasizing a potential constitutional challenge.