By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2025-11-11
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker expresses strong skepticism toward, or outright opposition to, the rapid green transition, labeling it a "green frenzy." The political focus centers on the legal and community impacts associated with the construction of large energy projects (wind farms). This is a value-driven stance, criticizing the overall direction of the policy.
2025-11-10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The speaker adopts a strongly opposing position regarding e-voting, demanding its immediate suspension, citing the fundamental principles of democratic governance and the rule of law. Another critical issue addressed is national defense, specifically emphasizing the need for the government to take responsibility for the absence of effective countermeasures against attack drones. These positions are primarily value-driven and aimed at criticizing the effectiveness of the government's performance.
2025-11-06
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The political stance is strongly geared toward annulling e-elections, highlighting the system's security vulnerabilities and potential manipulation by "button-pushers." The speaker also voiced concern over the systematic dismissal of bills introduced by the opposition in the Riigikogu (Parliament). This position is primarily procedural and security-focused.
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the government’s tax policy, especially regarding the motor vehicle tax, which they label as a property tax targeting rural residents. They emphasize previous economic success (pointing to 8% growth during Martin Helme’s tenure) and promise to abolish the car tax when EKRE comes to power in the future. The focus is on results-oriented criticism and a value-based opposition to raising taxes.
2025-11-04
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the ongoing ratification process of the international agreement, which is viewed as a pointless farce and an absurdity for the parliament. The stance focuses on procedural transparency and criticizes the Riigikogu's lack of genuine decision-making authority. The speaker stresses that this is already a mandatory ratification, not a matter of free choice.