By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The style is formal and focused on questions, directed at the Speaker of the Riigikogu and the candidate. At the same time, the speech contains an emotionally charged and critical term ("green madness"), which communicates a political judgment. The speaker employs a logical line of questioning to ascertain the candidate's prior position (developer versus community representative).

The style is sharp, interrogative, and confrontational, focusing on demanding accountability and criticizing the opposing side for avoiding answers ("you smoothly glossed over it"). Strong rhetorical comparisons are used (Estonia vs. Russia e-elections) to dramatically emphasize the author's position.

The rhetorical style is questioning, critical, and politically sharp, utilizing formal address toward the Chairman of the Riigikogu and the rapporteur. Logical arguments regarding the security vulnerabilities of e-elections are mixed with political accusations concerning the shelving of opposition bills.

The rhetorical style is highly combative, critical, and cynical, employing strong negative assessments such as "bungling" and "hocus-pocus zero trick." Logical arguments (the impact of taxes on consumer prices) are combined with emotional accusations directed at the coalition, referencing the breaking of election promises ("no new taxes will come and taxes will not rise"). The contrasting of propagandistic examples is utilized (e-elections vs. high VAT on foodstuffs).

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and combative, using strong negative assessments such as "a filigreed sales pitch," "a complete farce," and "utter nonsense." The style combines logical argument (the citation of a specific article) with emotional appeal, expressing indignation at the pointlessness of the procedure.