By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The political stance is firmly opposed to increasing taxes and state levies, viewing this as an unjust financial burden on citizens and an attempt to shift state responsibilities. Criticism is leveled both at the policy substance itself (such as the rising cost of official documents and the impact of land tax on agriculture) and at the legislative procedures used. The speaker represents the position of the Conservative People's Party of Estonia (EKRE), maintaining strong opposition to both draft laws.

The speaker adopts a fiercely critical stance on the government's economic policy, highlighting the three-year economic decline and the administration's failed performance. Also central to the discussion is concern over the transparency and size of the state's financial contribution toward supporting Ukraine's EU accession talks. Their criticism is primarily aimed at the government's actions and overall effectiveness.

The political position is strongly opposed to the car tax, which is being called a wealth tax, arguing that it worsens people's situation, especially in rural areas. It is emphasized that the current government has violated its pre-election promises regarding not raising taxes. In addition to criticizing the tax policy, attention is drawn to Estonia's unique e-voting system, which should either be modified or abolished in the interest of fair elections.

The political focus is centered on the lack of government transparency and the accountability of the Prime Minister regarding his foreign visits, particularly concerning the secrecy surrounding the Bilderberg meeting. There is a strong demand to clarify whether the Prime Minister attended the meeting as a representative of the government or in a private capacity. Criticism is also being leveled at the inefficiency of the government's operations and communication (the procedural framework).

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's tax policy, specifically the abolition of the income tax exemption for pensioners receiving the average pension. The most salient issue is the deterioration of pensioners' well-being and the breaking of government promises, which is framed as increasing poverty among the populace. The stance is highly critical of the government's actions and is outcome-driven, accusing the coalition of worsening the welfare of the people.

The political stance is strongly oppositional, focusing on the minister's specific failures and ethical issues. The need for accountability is stressed, citing the hiring of a lobbyist and the disregard for anti-corruption legislation in the case of the Deputy Secretary-General. Skepticism is also voiced regarding the opening of the labor quota, calling into question the government's optimistic report. The political framework is primarily results- and ethics-based, demanding the minister's resignation.