By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The main opponents are the government coalition and the committees responsible for drafting legislation, who are being criticized for the absence of substantive arguments and for disregarding procedural rules. Criticism was particularly sharp regarding the rapporteur of the Finance Committee due to his lack of preparation and for marginalizing the involvement of interest groups. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, demands are being made for the rejection of the draft legislation or the termination of the reading.

The main adversary is the government and the Reform Party, who are blamed for the economic downturn and unfair taxation, specifically the car tax. The criticism is scathing, focusing on political failure and the lack of transparency when making crucial decisions (such as those concerning EU subsidies).

The main confrontation is directed against the Reform Party and the government, who are accused of breaking pre-election promises and raising taxes. The criticism is intense, focusing both on the substance of the policy (the car tax being treated as a wealth tax) and the improper legislative procedure (lack of public consultation and the obstructive bundling of amendments).

The primary confrontation is aimed at Prime Minister Kaja Kallas and the government, who are criticized for a lack of transparency and insufficient communication in the performance of their official duties. Criticism is also directed at the procedure for replacing the government and the Prime Minister's personal attitude towards answering questions before the Riigikogu (Parliament).

The main opponents are the ruling coalition parties: the Reform Party, Eesti 200, and the Social Democrats. They are being intensely criticized for both political decisions (tax hikes, reduction of benefits) and procedural violations (the absence of WIK, the justification of urgency). The opposition is absolute; supporting the draft bill is ruled out, and the coalition stands accused of deceiving the electorate.

The primary target is the minister and the ministry he leads, who are being sharply criticized for ethical violations and specific failures. The criticism is aimed both at providing political cover within the European Union for platform companies and the disregard for anti-corruption legislation. The opposition's stance is intense, directly demanding the minister's resignation.