By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The strong opposition is focused on the procedures for handling the draft legislation, criticizing the committee's process, which they claim is actively seeking reasons not to support the bill. Furthermore, the security of the e-voting system is being criticized, with suggestions that the system could be vulnerable to attacks by a malicious state (Russia). The criticism is primarily procedural and policy-driven.

The primary criticism is leveled against the government as a whole, accusing them of failing to secure strategic investments and centralizing regional policy. The criticism focuses on policy and procedure, citing the Olerex case as an example, where oversight and public procurement processes are contradictory.

The main opponent is the government coalition, which is sharply criticized for its family policy, tax hikes, and benefit cuts. The criticism is policy-based (the removal of benefits for large families, the motor vehicle tax, the sugar tax) and procedural (the government dictates the direction to the Riigikogu, rather than the reverse). The government’s actions are being labeled as undermining the state and anti-family.

The primary conflict is between the head of government and a specific minister, who is accused of hostility towards families. The criticism is intense, focusing on political failure (the declining birth rate) and the misuse of administrative procedures (the creation of a commission to delay matters).

The speaker is in strong opposition, criticizing the Reform Party and the government for political stalling (specifically, restricting voting rights/suffrage) and for how the government sets its priorities (prioritizing the coalition agreement over the national interest). The coalition’s actions in local municipalities are also indirectly criticized regarding the timing of council sessions, which obstructs the work of opposition members.

The opposition is directed at the government's actions and administrative capacity, particularly concerning the education reform and the payment of supplementary wages to teachers in Ida-Virumaa. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, stressing that salary delays cannot constitute a long-term strategy and that checking documents twice a year is "incomprehensible."

The main opponent is the government, which is being criticized for taxing families into poverty and for ineffective tax solutions (like the car tax). The speaker explicitly rejects the claims that EKRE does not support national defense spending, stressing that conservatives have always advocated for 3% defense expenditure. The criticism is primarily policy- and value-based.