By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The main criticism is aimed at the Social Democrats, whose line of reasoning is dismissed as being simultaneously laughable and yet fear-mongering. There is also strong opposition to electoral alliances, which are characterized as an improper "hodgepodge" that obstructs communication between the central government and the local level. The criticism is both political-structural and personal/dismissive (referencing the insignificance of the opposing speaker's vote tally).

The opposition is aimed at the government's tax increases and policies, which have driven the agricultural sector into deficit and forced consumers to prioritize price when purchasing. The criticism is political and intense, suggesting that the government is essentially taking farmers' own money. Solutions are expected from the Minister of Regional Affairs (Social Democrats). This criticism is supported by economic data (for example, VAT revenue collection is lower than planned).

The opposition is directed at the government (the Interior Minister acting as Prime Minister) regarding the lack of a concrete action plan on issues of mass immigration and the return of Ukrainians. The government's claims are criticized because, in the speaker's estimation, they are untrue concerning the wishes of the Ukrainian President. The criticism is policy- and results-based.

There is insufficient data.

The primary criticism is aimed at the "current coalition" and its tax policy, particularly the implementation of indirect taxes. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the negative impact of the tax increases on consumers and the business sector.

The opposition is directed at the assessment made by the Chancellery of the Riigikogu, which deemed the special labeling an interference in the business environment—a claim the speaker rejects, stressing instead the protection of consumer freedom of choice. The Reform Party was also criticized (with a humorous reference), and the chair of the session was asked whether the questions posed by a certain questioner regarding court cases were relevant to the draft bill.

There is not enough data.

The confrontation is aimed directly at the policies of the government and the Prime Minister, criticizing their passivity and selective approach when it comes to taking a leadership role in Europe. The criticism is policy-driven, alleging that the government has embraced the 'green frenzy,' which will lead to the closure of production facilities in Narva and the oil shale industry.

The opposition is aimed at the actions of the government and ministries, criticizing their failure to ensure the full employment of immigrants and their lack of flexibility when funding regional projects. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on rigid deadlines and inadequate financing that ultimately prevented the Jõhvi project from being implemented.