By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

Lack of data

The style of cooperation is characterized by openness to answering questions and a willingness to agree with questioners on certain economic principles (e.g., the importance of profit, the positive impact of lowering excise duties). The primary focus, however, remains on garnering support for their faction's draft bill, while stressing that this represents the minimum action achievable in the current circumstances.

The style of cooperation is demonstrated by repeating and supporting the colleague's (Mart Helme's) question, indicating internal consistency. There is no mention of cross-party cooperation or willingness to compromise with the government.

The cooperation style is respectful and appreciative, starting with valuing the presenter's work. The speaker is engaged in posing a constructive question to clarify the funding objectives and their impact on Estonian-Ukrainian cooperation.

The speaker starts by commending the previous presentation, showing respect and appreciation for the insightful overview. A willingness to collaborate is then expressed by offering a solution framed as a question, while simultaneously looking for ways to boost consumption.

The speaker supportively referenced the arguments made by the previous speaker (Henn Põlluaas) regarding the specific sections of the Food Act, thereby demonstrating collaboration with like-minded colleagues. The closing remarks urged all members of parliament to support the draft bill, indicating a desire to achieve broad-based support necessary for ensuring consumer safety.

The collaborative style is respectful, involving addressing the rapporteur for information about the draft bill and the NGO's operations. The speaker is seeking clarity on parliamentary procedures, which indicates a desire to participate in the process, but there are no references to cross-party collaboration.

Not enough data

Mention is made of earlier unsuccessful negotiations with the ministry concerning Jõhvi funding, where the aim was to increase the funding and extend the deadline. This indicates a desire to find solutions, but simultaneously highlights the lack of cooperation caused by rigid rules. There is no data available regarding the current inter-party cooperation.