By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The opposition is directed at the policy and regulatory framework of the government (the Interior Minister) which is considered insufficient for controlling agency labor. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on systemic loopholes and the risk of their exploitation, especially regarding the transportation of people.

Strong opposition to the government's policies, accusing the administration of prioritizing budget revenue (400 million) over the livelihood of the people. The government is also criticized for defending a rigid and unreasonable flat-rate tax system that deviates from international practice.

The primary opposition targets the drafters of the bill (the ministry), who face criticism for submitting a flawed proposal—an omnibus bill structure that bundles several disparate issues into a single law. The criticism is both policy-driven and procedural, accusing the government of increasing bureaucracy and placing agricultural entrepreneurs at a disadvantage. The opposition is robust, demanding that the reading of the bill be suspended.

The opposition is directed at the coalition partners and the legislative committee, who are criticized for exacerbating opacity and failing to take an independent stance. The criticism is primarily procedural, as the committee simply adopted the government's position instead of making its own decision in its capacity as the employer of the Riigikogu.

The sharpest criticism is aimed at the minister's and the government's (especially Eesti 200's) austerity policy, which is viewed as a disregard for regional security. The government is being criticized for appealing to raw numbers and threatening layoffs in order to force judges to vacate the building in Jõhvi. The argument that the money saved by these cuts will be allocated to national defense is rejected, and the claim is dismissed as an illusion.