By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The records indicate communication with the minister by raising questions and concerns, seeking clarifications and assurances. There is no evidence of cooperation with colleagues or other political parties.

There is not enough data.

Cooperation is evident within the faction itself, as the final proposal is submitted on behalf of the Estonian Conservative People's Party faction. Furthermore, a colleague's (Rain Epler) previous position is referenced to support the argument concerning the Labour Inspectorate's inspection focus. There is no data available regarding inter-party cooperation or willingness to compromise.

The speaker builds upon a question posed by their colleague (Rene Kokk), demonstrating cooperation within their own faction while continuing and deepening the subject he initiated. However, the attitude towards the coalition and the commission is demanding and confrontational, focusing on demanding accountability and criticizing the lack of transparency.

In terms of cooperation, the speaker adopts a rather confrontational stance toward the minister, yet simultaneously signals the local government's willingness to support the continued existence of the Jõhvi courthouse. The call to the minister is to secure the necessary resources and initiate negotiations with the developer to achieve a sensible agreement—a move that suggests a genuine desire to find a solution rather than merely offering criticism.