By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

Economic perspectives are leaning towards reducing regulations, supporting the elimination of CO2 quotas. These quotas are tied to stock market issues and investment portfolios, indicating a desire to ease the regulatory burden for the benefit of the economy.

Insufficient data.

The speaker strongly opposes the government minister’s statement regarding higher taxation of the wealthy or the demand for a social tax levy, viewing this as creating a state-destructive disparity. This position emphasizes social unity and stands in opposition to the government’s proposed ideas for redistribution.

Economic viewpoints strongly advocate for tax reductions, particularly concerning the VAT on foodstuffs, in order to ease the financial burden on consumers and stimulate small businesses in rural areas. Tax hikes (excise duties, income tax, and VAT) are viewed as detrimental to the economy, leading to even higher food prices. Support is given to improving the competitiveness of domestic producers.

The prevailing economic perspective stresses the importance of maintaining tax revenue and protecting the existing oil shale industry, thereby opposing any phase-out of oil shale. The objectives include ensuring competitiveness and establishing a subsidy-free electricity market. Furthermore, warnings are raised regarding the economic repercussions of making decisions without conducting a prior impact assessment.

Economic views highlight criticism concerning government overhead spending, specifically questioning the necessity and practical value of the new position—that of an events organizer—from the average taxpayer's perspective.

Economic considerations center on protecting the interests of the fishing industry and professional fishermen against a direct reduction in output. The damage is quantified (30 tons of fish per day), underscoring the necessity of regulating nature to safeguard economic interests and businesses.

There is no data available regarding economic views, taxes, spending, or regulations.

The speaker is a strong advocate for economic growth and improving public welfare, viewing these as top priorities. He is skeptical of regulations (such as gender quotas) that fail to demonstrate direct economic stimulation, criticizing their presentation as indicators of economic growth.